Thursday, October 05, 2006

Coffee, cigars, sex 'behind longevity'

From correspondents in Havana

NEWS.com.au

October 05, 2006 04:33am

Article from: Agence France-Presse

CUBA'S high number of centenarians said their longevity is a result of going easy on alcohol, but indulging in coffee, cigars and sex, according to a survey released today.

Cuba, with a population of 11.2 million, has about 3000 people who have lived more than a century. A study was carried out of 54 of the more than 100 centenarians who live in Santa Clara province, which has Cuba's highest average age, by Professor Nancy Nepomucemo.

The results were reported to the National Geriatrics and Social Work workshop, according to the newspaper Juventud Rebelde. Their lives are disciplined, the study found, yet not austere - none was alcoholic, and they expressed a love for coffee and cigars. They maintained a strong interest in their sex lives and other topics, the study said.

Most of the super-seniors were mentally alert, do manual labour in rural areas, and 60 per cent said their parents also were long-lived.

Ninety-five per cent ate a diet including fish, eggs, milk, white meat, vegetables, and manioc, which they cook with little salt and natural seasonings.

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Coffee for the Guys

photography by christopher gilbert

10/4/2006

Written By: Chantelle

For Gilkatho Pty Ltd.
An Australian Coffee Co.

How do you take your morning coffee? A dash of milk? A cup of sugar? Maybe even a bit of Irish crème? I bet you’ve never taken it with legs before though… It comes from Chile, and it’s called café con piernas. It essentially means ‘coffee with legs’. Basically a café con piernas is a stand-up coffee bar staffed entirely by stunning, barely-dressed women. Amazingly, despite what you may be thinking, some of the best coffee in Chile can, in fact, be found with a side of legs. Whilst Paris may house the Moulin Rouge, and the US may claim home to the notorious Hooters, the sexy café con piernas appear to be of a purely Chilean phenomenon. However, these sexy Chilean coffee shops possess some surprisingly different characteristics to their foreign counterparts which are scattered across the globe. For example, rule number one for these cafés is no nights, no weekends. Business in these coffee shops is run strictly from 9a.m. until 9p.m. every weekday, only. According to locals the busiest hours are generally in the morning. No real shock factor there, as many customers come in to drink their first coffee of the day…or five…or six… Even more differentiating and stunning is that there is no alcohol. These really are just normal coffee shops, in which every person who serves you just so happens to be absolutely gorgeous and very scantily-clad. Additionally, there’s no cover, no doorman and cheap coffee. Who would have thought that there would be anywhere in the world you could see such a view without burning a lovely deep hole in your change pocket. Likewise, the drinks would cost multiple times more than the affordable 700-900 peso coffees (US $1.50) found in these cafés. So, if you’re looking for a sexy coffee at a cheap price, or if you’re just looking for your husband who left for his morning coffee days ago, Santiago is the place to go!

Sunday, October 01, 2006

Colombian coffee growers hurt by chemical spray

Crops sprayed with chemicals meant to destroy cocaine are disrupting coffee farmers.




Many WSU students start out their day with a visit to the coffee stand before class. However, these students may not be thinking about where the coffee they enjoy as a morning wake up comes from.

“We want to focus our presentation in the Northwest, because coffee is such a huge part of the culture,” said Beth Poteet, Northwest regional organizer for Witness for Peace. The group hosted a presentation made through a translator by Freddy Urbano, a Colombian campesino, or farm, leader and coffee grower.

On Thursday evening, a roomful of WSU students in CUE Room 419 listened to Urbano share his own story about the difficulties of growing coffee in Colombia because of crop fumigation by the U.S. government. Fumigation is meant to destroy coca plants – the raw material used in cocaine.

However, the U.S.-funded Plan Colombia program is targeting the smaller scale farms rather than the large areas of coca plants grown by Colombian drug traffickers, Urbano said.

Plan Colombia has provided more than $4.2 million in aid to fight the “War on Drugs,” Urbano said. The fumigations were damaging to 57 families in the area of Cauca, Colombia, in 2005. These families’ coca growing operations are minuscule in comparison to the drug traffickers’.

Urbano said less than

18 percent of the U.S. aid goes to displaced families or to alternative development programs like Cosurca, a small-scale coffee farmer’s organization.

Fumigation is a process of spraying crops with powerful poisonous substance similar to weed killer, Urbano said. Not only does the aerial fumigation kill illegal coca plants, it kills other vegetation such as family crops that are often the only source of food. Often, the major coca plant growers do not receive fumigation, Urbano said.

He said 90 percent of the farms fumigated were not even growing coca plants. These farmers are part of Urbano’s organization, Cosurca.

The average campesino does not produce large amounts of coca plants, unlike illegal drug traffickers, Urbano said. The average harvest for a farming family in Colombia occurs every three months. Usually, about 30 bags of coca weighing 25 pounds each will bring in less than $20 per bag. This comes to around $2,300 a year, which is just enough to sustain a family.

Even though the U.S. has provided money to Colombia to help eradicate the growing of coca plants, there still is no solution to the problem, Urbano said. Poverty and crime continue to increase.

The families growing small amounts of coca are aware they contribute to illegal drug use and trafficking, but often lack an alternative, he said.

Corsuca is a cooperative organization of peasant, indigenous and Afro-Colombian groups in Cauca, Urbano said.

The group’s main goal is to continue eradicating coca plants many farmers depend on for a small source of income. In doing this, the group helps farmers come up with positive alternatives, such as the growing of fair-trade coffee. Urbano said coffee crops provide a stabler economy.

In the seven years leading up to June 2006, about 520,000 coca plants were eradicated and replaced by coffee, he said.

“When legal work is available, people are very willing to stop growing coca,” Urbano said through a translator. “People want to have a dignified life without coca.”

Urbano made the presentation with the help of translator Kath Nygard, who works with Witness for Peace in Bogota, Colombia. This organization supports peace, justice and sustainable economies by promoting change in governmental policies in Latin America.

Corsuca supports a change in the system that makes farmers not just producers of raw materials, but gets them involved in the agricultural-industrial process that includes processing, sales and exporting. So far, Corsuca has increased farmers’ profits by about 45 percent, Urbano said. This money is equally distributed among the Corsuca farmers.

Corsuca also supports fair trade, and all of its members’ coffee production is sold as fair-trade coffee.

Urbano said he hopes to convince as many people as possible to learn about the situation so they can fight policy that has been destructive in Colombia and Latin America.

People can support Corsuca by voting to end U.S. involvement through military aid and to stop fumigation in Latin America, Urbano said.


Originally published in the Daily Evergreen on October 1st, 2006. The Daily Evergreen is a WSU publication

Friday, September 29, 2006

When art and architecture merge

photography: javacity by birdw0rks

Monday, September 25, 2006

photography by C. Drewing

International Coffee Organization to Review Recommendations for a Sustainable Coffee Sector

Press Release - Oxfam GB

Monday, September 25, 2006 - 09:38 PM



London - The International Coffee Organization (ICO) must heed the recommendations on sustainability put forward by Cameroon, Honduras, and the United States, and make the interests of 25 million small-scale family coffee farmers across the world an integral part of its work when it meets in London starting today, says international development organization Oxfam.


The ICO is in the midst of renewing its operating charter, the International Coffee Agreement (ICA). Oxfam and other groups representing small-scale family coffee farmers say that the renewed charter will be vital in helping to level the playing field for millions of poor farming families around the world, whose livelihoods are being destroyed because they can't compete in the global market due to unequal terms.

As its September meetings begin today, the ICO will have an opportunity to consider recommendations from coffee-producing and consuming countries that emphasize the need to create a more sustainable coffee sector.

"A more sustainable coffee supply chain benefits everyone in it, from the largest roasters to the 25 million small-scale coffee farmers and farm workers struggling every day to make a living," said Seth Petchers, the coffee lead for Oxfam's Make Trade Fair campaign. "The ICO is hearing this message from member countries; now it's time for action."

The ICO is the only dedicated forum for discussing coffee-related matters at the international level, bringing together coffee-producing and consuming countries around one table. It could be the focal point for international co-operation to bring about a truly sustainable coffee economy.

World coffee prices plummeted in 1999, devastating coffee farming communities around the world. Despite recent improvements, the price continues to fluctuate, and the crisis for coffee farmers persists. To make matters worse, they don't have enough access to credit and information to plan and market their crops.

A paper released this year by Oxfam International and 12 allies, called Grounds for Change: Creating a Voice for Small Coffee Farmers and Farmworkers with the Next International Coffee Agreement, recommends that the ICO:

creates forums within the organization dedicated to making coffee production more sustainable; ensures fair representation of small-scale farmers and farm workers alongside the coffee companies; creates systems so that all parties, including farmers, have access to relevant coffee-sector information; and facilitates co-ordinated, well-resourced responses to the crucial issues facing small-scale farmers including: technical assistance, risk management, and access to credit.


Saturday, September 23, 2006

Roasters say no plans to match Starbucks coffee price hike

illustration by fred wickham
more of fred wickham can be seen at http://www.bullseyerooster.com


By Susan Buchanan
Of Dow Jones Newswires

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Major U.S. coffee roasters say they have no immediate intention of matching a hike in prices planned by Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) for Oct. 3. "P&G currently is not planning to increase list prices for any coffees within our portfolio," said Lars Atorf, spokesman for Procter & Gamble (PG), maker of Folgers and Millstone brands. "This might have to do with the fact that the cost structure of P&G's product portfolio is certainly very different from Starbucks'."

Starbucks will raise prices 5 cents per cup and 50 cents per 16-ounce bag in early October, citing rising fuel, health-care, labor and raw-ingredient prices. Larry Baumann, spokesman for Kraft Foods, maker of Maxwell House and Yuban, said "for competitive reasons we don't speculate on future actions." Roasters have been watching arabica prices, which sped to 3-month highs on the New York Board of Trade in August and then backed down.

Coffee companies are also tracking robusta prices--which account for 30% to 70% of beans used in top, commercially-sold arabica blends in the U.S. London robusta futures rallied to almost 8-year highs in early September but have since eased. P&G and Kraft use robusta beans, while Starbucks says it purchases only arabicas. Starbucks last raised prices on its drinks in 2004 and last hiked whole-bean coffee prices 9 years ago.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006


Appealing to the visual senses

Friday, September 15, 2006

Hivos is a non-profit organization, rooted in The Netherlands dedicated to a free, fair and sustainable world

114M lawsuit over coffee coupon

photo © Michael Lane for openphoto.net

Starbucks clearly never heard the term 'viral email'

It perhaps wasn't the smartest offer in Starbucks long corporate history. When the company sent an email round to its employees with a coupon for a free 'grande' iced drink, suggesting that they forward it to 'friends and family', it probably shouldn't have been hard to work out that it might end up getting forwarded to rather a large number of people.

But when they noticed how many people were showing up claiming their free drinks, they quickly pulled the offer, a month before it was originally due to expire.

And now an attorney in New York is suing them for $114million, on the grounds of 'betrayal' and 'fraud'.

Peter Sullivan has launched a class-action suit against the company on behalf of all the people denied a free drink. However, currently the only plaintiff actually involved is a paralegal named Kelly Coakley.

Mr Sullivan hopes that some other people will join his lawsuit in the fullness of time.

He said: 'In New York, this is of great significance to many people day-to-day. There were lines of people outside Starbucks. There are a lot of upset people.'

The case is already being compared by some to the lawsuit in which McDonalds were sued over their coffee being too hot. The difference here being that nobody was caused third degree burns.

This article originally appeared in metro.co.uk on 12 September 2006

http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/article.html?in_article_id=19596&in_page_id=2

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Coffee a top source of healthy antioxidants

photography provided through flikr


But beverage is still no substitute for fruits and vegetables


The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - When the Ink Spots sang “I love the java jive and it loves me” in 1940, they could not have known how right they were.


Coffee not only helps clear the mind and perk up the energy, it also provides more healthful antioxidants than any other food or beverage in the American diet, according to a study released Sunday.

Of course, too much coffee can make people jittery and even raise cholesterol levels, so food experts stress moderation.

The findings by Joe A. Vinson, a chemistry professor at the University of Scranton, in Pennsylvania, give a healthy boost to the warming beverage.

“The point is, people are getting the most antioxidants from beverages, as opposed to what you might think,” Vinson said in a telephone interview.

Antioxidants, which are thought to help battle cancer and provide other health benefits, are abundant in grains, tomatoes and many other fruits and vegetables.

Vinson said he was researching tea and cocoa and other foods and decided to study coffee, too.

His team analyzed the antioxidant content of more than 100 different food items, including vegetables, fruits, nuts, spices, oils and common beverages. They then used Agriculture Department data on typical food consumption patterns to calculate how much antioxidant each food contributes to a person’s diet.

They concluded that the average adult consumes 1,299 milligrams of antioxidants daily from coffee. The closest competitor was tea at 294 milligrams. Rounding out the top five sources were bananas, 76 milligrams; dry beans, 72 milligrams; and corn, 48 milligrams. According to the Agriculture Department, the typical adult American drinks 1.64 cups of coffee daily.

That does not mean coffee is a substitute for fruit and vegetables.

“Unfortunately, consumers are still not eating enough fruits and vegetables, which are better for you from an overall nutritional point of view due to their higher content of vitamins, minerals and fiber,” Vinson said.

Dates, cranberries, red grapes

Dates, cranberries and red grapes are among the leading fruit sources of antioxidants, he said.

The antioxidants in coffee are known as polyphenols. Sometimes they are bound to a sugar molecule, which covers up the antioxidant group, Vinson said.

The first step in measuring them was to break that sugar link. He noted that chemicals in the stomach do the same thing, freeing the polyphenols.

“We think that antioxidants can be good for you in a number of ways,” including affecting enzymes and genes, though more research is needed, Vinson said.

“If I say more coffee is better, then I would have to tell you to spread it out to keep the levels of antioxidants up,” Vinson said. “We always talk about moderation in anything.”

His findings were released in conjunction with the annual convention of the American Chemical Society in Washington.

In February, a team of Japanese researchers reported in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute that people who drank coffee daily, or nearly every day, had half the liver cancer risk of those who never drank it. The protective effect occurred in people who drank one to two cups a day and increased at three to four cups.

Diabetes risk

Last year, researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health found that drinking coffee cut the risk of developing the most common form of diabetes.

Men who drank more than six 8-ounce cups of caffeinated coffee per day lowered their risk of type 2 diabetes by about half, and women reduced their risk by nearly 30 percent, compared with people who did not drink coffee, according to the study in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Bonnie Liebman, nutrition director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said she was not surprised by Vinson’s finding, because tea has been known to contain antioxidants.

But Liebman, who was not part of Vinson’s research team, cautioned that while many people have faith that antioxidants will reduce the risk of cancer, heart disease and more, the evidence has not always panned out. Most experts are looking beyond antioxidants to the combination of vitamins, minerals other nutrition in specific foods, she said.

This article previously appeared on msnbc.com - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9105892/


Monday, September 11, 2006

mug shot

mug art photography
made possible through flickr
photography by Di

photography by melvinipro

Ask Pablo: The Coffee Mug Debacle

By Pablo Paster for TriplePundit

11 September 2006

This week's question comes to us from TriplePundit creator, Nick Aster: "What's better for my daily coffee in the context of as many different environmental and social impacts you can think of? - an aluminum mug, a ceramic mug, or a new paper cup every day?" To make things a bit more interesting I am going to take some artistic license and change the question to encompass a Stainless Steel Mug, a Ceramic Mug, and a Styrofoam Cup. Since we are such a caffeine fueled society I have chosen to compare each of these at a 16 oz. size.

Stainless Steel (SS) is a ferrous alloy (a combination of two or more elements that includes iron). It contains at least 10% Chromium, which gives it anti-corrosive properties (English: it won't rust). Each gram of SS is responsible for the use,displacement, or consumption of 14.4g of abiotic material (mineral substances including ore and fossil fuels), 205g of water, and is responsible for the release of 2.8g of greenhouse gasses (GHGs).

Ceramic is an " inorganic non-metallic materials whose formation is due to the action of heat" (hooray Wikipedia!). Basically it is a clay that requires kiln firing to remove moisture... Since it is made by heating up some dirt it's impact is relatively minimal. To create one gram of ceramic we inconvenience 2.11g of abiotic material (mostly the clay and some natural gas), 5.3g of water, and we create a mere 0.065g of GHGs.

Our final material for this analysis is polystyrene ("many styrenes", linked in a long chain), also known by the brand name Styrofoam. Polystyrene (PS) is a thermoplastic (meaning that it can be melted repeatedly, as opposed to a thermoset plastic like epoxy which can not be melted), making it recyclable. Unfortunately it is not recycled in many states, including California. The reason for this can be found in simple economics. Since expanded polystyrene (foam, as opposed to the PS that is found in many clear drinking cups, especially on many airlines) takes up a lot of space, relative to its low weight, it can not be economically transported over long distances to the nearest recycling plant that is capable of processing it. Pre-processing it locally before shipment requires expensive equipment which is not justified by the low value of the recycled material (since it's just so cheap to make it from scratch). So, to our dismay, most of it ends up in landfills (to be extracted by future generations, right?). To create 1 gram of PS requires the use of 2.51g of abiotic material (mostly the oil from which it is made), 164g of water, and is responsible for the release of 2.8g of GHGs.

Since the PS cup is considered disposable and the other two are intended for daily reuse we are comparing apples to oranges, right? Well, not if we compare them per "service unit." In this case our service unit is " the service of holding the caffeinated morning beverage of our choice while we drag ourselves to work." We have analyzed the materials, now we need to determine the material intensity per unit.

In my research I found the weights of each of the following 16 oz. beverage containers:

Polystyrene - 6g

Ceramic - 322g

Stainless Steel - 378g

Now, by multiplying the material intensity values that we found earlier by each container's weight, we can find their total material intensity. For each 16 oz. container we use the following amount of abiotic material:

Polystyrene - 14.8g

Ceramic - 679.4g

Stainless Steel - 5454.5g

Based on this result alone, you would have to use your mug at least 46 times (daily for a month and a half) and you would have to use your SS mug at least 369 times (daily for a year) to justify its higher material intensity. The results for water are a little more difficult to grasp since water is a renewable resource that continues through its natural cycles after we use it (PS - 966g, Ceramic - 1,706g, SS - 77,528g). For the highly-processed SS, we need 164 times as much water as the mug holds ( 77.5 liters)!

The results in the GHG category are also quite striking. Keep in mind that, based on UN figures on the cost of climate change and the annual global CO2 emissions, each ton of GHGs is responsible for $8 in damages. (PS - 16.5, Ceramic - 20.9, SS - 1068g) Again, the Stainless Steel has the greatest material intensity with over 1kg of GHGs, or roughly $0.01 in climate change-related damages.

This essentially concludes my analysis. In summary, a ceramic mug has the lowest material intensity of the three as long as you use it at least 46 times. Since most ceramic mugs enjoy long and happy lives in our kitchens this is quite feasible. But please remember that purchasing tacky or holiday-themed mugs that will recieve limited use actually have a higher environmental impact than styrofoam cups do! So, if you don't already have a reusable beverage container go out and get yourself something timeless and use it often.

Got you thinking? Please stay tuned to “Beanblog” for regular challenges in response to this and other sustainability issues that impact the coffee community and those who drink it.

To respond directly to Pablo post your response to

http://www.triplepundit.com/pages/ask-pablo-the-coffee-mug-debac-002246.php


Sunday, September 10, 2006

US: Wrigley tests out coffee gum popularity

Wm Wrigley has executed a limited launch for a coffee-flavoured chewing gum in the US called Doublemint Kona Crème.


The gum, on sale at 7-Eleven stores in the country, is retailing at GBP0.99 per 17-stick pack, according to the Chicago Sun Times.

The company's Wrigley's Coffee Gum has reportedly been a success since it was launched in China last year.


Wrigley is testing the water before a possible wider launch for Doublemint Kona Crème, but was unavailable for comment when contacted by just-food.


originally broadcasted 7 May 2006 source: just-foods.com